the power and responsibility of editing

raymond carverA good editor might make your writing. A bad editor will ruin it.

Raymond Carver has long been one of my favorite writers. His terse, emotionally complex prose isn’t to everyone’s taste, but I’ve found it to mine. Recent revelations about his relationship with his editor, Gordon Lish, make me wonder just who it is I’ve been appreciating all these years.

The opening lines of his classic What We Talk About When We Talk About Love, in particular, have always grabbed me and held on tight:

My friend Mel McGinnis was talking. Mel McGinnis is a cardiologist, and sometimes that gives him the right.

The four of us were sitting around his kitchen table drinking gin. Sunlight filled the kitchen from the big window behind the sink. There were Mel and me and his second wife, Teresa—Terri, we called her—and my wife, Laura. We lived in Albuquerque then. But we were all from somewhere else.

It’s one of the most fascinating opening passages I’ve ever read, saying as it does so much with so little. But as it turns out, Carver’s original version was something quite different. Titled Beginners, it read like so:

My friend Herb McGinnis, a cardiologist, was talking. The four of us were sitting around his kitchen table drinking gin. It was Saturday afternoon. Sunlight filled the kitchen from the big window behind the sink. There were Herb and I and his second wife, Teresa—Terri, we called her—and my wife, Laura. We lived in Albuquerque, but we were all from somewhere else.

You can see a side-by-side comparison of the whole story here. You can learn more about the relationship between Carver and Lish here.

Lish seems to have been the kind of editor every writer hates: heavy-handed and prone to not only rewriting but inserting passages of his own. And yet I can’t — if I’m being honest — deny that he improved the work in significant ways.

It points out just how difficult it can be to bring written material to print. The creator, naturally, has a huge stake in what’s being said. But there’s no denying that an engaged, thoughtful set of outside eyes can take something good and push it to greatness. Or, more often, take something middling and make it good.

The keys to making the process work are trust and communication. It will not work without both, and the sad fact is that there are far more bad editors out there than good ones. The right mix is delicate and hard to come by, but it’s worth looking.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]






6 Responses to “the power and responsibility of editing”

Raymond Carver rocks! Thanks for the thoughtful perspective on his relationship with his editor.

Andy added this on Feb 26 08 at 7:20 am

Thanks for the comment, Andy. Glad you dug the post.

neal added this on Feb 26 08 at 11:20 am

Lordy lou, I wish I had an editor like that.

All the editors I’ve worked with seem to think whatever I’m doing is just fine and they don’t take that level of care and it annoys me to no end.

Bryan Young added this on Feb 27 08 at 12:09 pm

Man I couldn’t agree with you more here. This is like a Lennon and McCartney relationship…it comes along once in a generation…but only because so few people have enough confidence to let go of ego and accept input from other talented individuals. A collective brain will always triumph when we are secure enough in our talents to listen and accept input from others. It is the very basis of crowd sourcing and tapping the collective brain.

Talent is of course paramount but creative transcendence depends on the ability to listen, learn and apply the insights of others.

john added this on Feb 27 08 at 11:49 pm

Damn, John, you nailed it right there. I literally could not possibly have said it better.

neal added this on Feb 28 08 at 12:39 am

The thing with having an editor is that it’s different than a collaboration. Although they might yield the same result, a collaboration has more of an equal footing creatively in the immediate process and editing is more of a stern guiding hand that comes in afterwards to rearrange the creativity….

Both of those relationships are important, but I think there is a mild distinction there.

That being said, I think my work is at least twice as good with a collaborator.

Bryan Young added this on Feb 28 08 at 1:25 am

Leave a Reply

- Why ask? This confirms you are a human user!